Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:45:34 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> 1) Does the ECACHL have any official, or unofficial, or any type at all,
> connections to the ECAC?
Not that I know of, or at the very least, substantially less than it did
before. Basically, the main ECAC offices have no control over the ECACHL
at all anymore.
> 2) Are they tied to the dumb acronym name? Why not make a clean break
> and call it ECHA?
The name is rumored to be changing at some point during the offseason. It
likely won't be "ECHA", though, since that acronym is already used by a
club hockey league. We don't know what the new name will be yet.
> 3) Any chance they could convince the Ivies to start earlier and go up
> to 32 or 34 games? I think that is very important for the image of the
> league, and I would hope the Ivy coaches themselves would push for it.
> It is nt so much the number of games, but they don't start practicing
> and playing until the rest of the nation has been playing for weeks.
> Either you play D-I or you don't, IMO.
I can't say for certain, but I would guess this won't happen anytime soon.
Not that I don't think it should, since I would like the Ivies as a whole
to become more competitive with other teams.
--Will Devine
|
|
|