Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 1997 01:39:28 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Greg R. Berge wrote:
> First, this doesn't follow. Getting an undeserved auto bid and losing 11-1
> every year won't help the new conference, while if 1+ members of the new
> conference qualify by PWR (or whatever system the NC$$ is then using) all
> well and good. I don't think anyone is suggesting that the new teams be
> *barred* from the tournament. That would be cause for complaint; denial of
> an auto-bid to an unproven conference with no history of competitiveness
> against the established teams is reasonable.
How would an autobid for the new conference compare to the independent
bid several years ago?
+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Michael Patrick Bresina | America's always had a problem |
| [log in to unmask] | with illegal aliens. Ask any Indian. |
+-----------------------------+-----------+----------------------------+
| Common sense is what tells us the world is flat. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| I don't judge a man by the color of his skin; |
| I judge him by his choice of internet provider. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| I'm not an elevator boy, though I play one in some people's karma. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|