HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 9 Nov 1992 11:29:11 -0500
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
OK, SO I'M A LITTLE FREE WITH THAT "SEND" KEY...
 
Cornell line-up
 
LW		C		RW
 
16 DROUIN *	 9 HUGHES	20 MCMANUS
 7 SCOLLAN *	15 HANNAH	21 CHARTRAND *
19 DAVIS	17 KARAM	26 HAMMOND
16 SANCIMINO *	14 LOPATKA *	10 BUMSTEAD
 
ALSO: 28 MCARTER (THIRD LINE MUSICAL WING)
 
D		D
 
24 VOGEL	23 FELLI
 3 VERSHININ *	 6 BELZILE
 4 HOLOWATIUK *	 2 ETTLES
 
ALSO: 22 DUFRESNE
 
G
 
31 BANDURSKI
 
*'s - FRESHMEN
 
 
 
Box Score:
 
Waterloo	4	0	1	-	5
Cornell		4	5	0	-	9
 
01:56 W WYNNE (WOODS, DALY)
02:21 W KRAEMER (MACDONALD)
03:07 C HUGHES (DROUIN, MCMANUS)
03:35 C HANNAH (SCOLLAN)
05:38 C MCMANUS (HUGHES)
08:43 W HARTNETT (SNYDER, WYNNE)
09:41 W KRAEMER (WILLIAMS)
18:57 C KARAM (HAMMOND, HOLOWATIUK)
 
02:08 C SCOLLAN (VERSHININ, CHARTRAND)
05:34 C HUGHES (DROUIN, MCMANUS)
09:12 C HANNAH (SCOLLAN, VOGEL)
13:00 C HANNAH (SCOLLAN, CHARTRAND)
17:35 C DROUIN (VOGEL, ETTLES)
 
???   W WOODS (WYNNE, RAWSON)
 
 
Saves:
 
W ORGAN 21, MURPHY 14
C BANDURSKI 21
 
 
Comments:
 
Apparently, Waterloo had been beating up opponents by ridiculous
scores (15-1), so this performance may actually mean something.
Freshmen are everywhere (and, of course, there were no names on the
jerseys), and some look impressive: Mark Scollan looked like he'd been
playing with Shaun Hannah for three years; Geoff Lopatka looked like
he'd set up a goal or two in his former life; most of the frosh looked
like strong, skilled skaters.
 
The main image carried from this game: there was always something
happening out there (which, if you saw a Cornell game last year, is a
minor miracle)! The forwards actually led plays into the offensive
zone - they didn't just dump and chase. When a scoring chance didn't
connect, there was actually a follow-up. And SPEED KILLS - Waterloo
kept being forced into mistakes and penalties.
 
Anyway, it wasn't nearly as awful as most of us were expecting.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2