LISTSERV - HOCKEY-L Archives

HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HOCKEY-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Re: 2 Referees and one Linesman ???
From:	Charles Shub <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	[log in to unmask]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 1992 17:12:19 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (15 lines)

> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1992 17:38:38 EST
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re:  2 Referees and one Linesman ???
> To: Multiple recipients of list HOCKEY-L <[log in to unmask]>
> X-Cc:         [log in to unmask]
>
> Rule 5.2 covers this; the first of the 3 methods it discusses.  The second
> is 2 referees; the third is 1 ref w/ 2 linesmen.
 
OK, so it is an alternative covered by the rules.  Why would ECAC be
experimenting with it?
 
charlie shub  [log in to unmask]  -or-  cdash@colospgs (BITNET)
  or even         (719) 593-3492

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.MAINE.EDU