HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jeffrey T. Anbinder" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Dec 1991 12:57:27 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
My guess, Ross, is that no individual player, coach or athletic director
wants to start action against Pierre, whether disciplinary or impeaching
or otherwise, because nobody wants to get on the bad side of the referees.
 
What if Pierre is exonerated, and returns to referee a game involving the
team that brought action against him?  Referees are quite capable (although
I'm sure it's rare) of affecting a game to the point where a particular
team is at enough of a disadvantage to lose, without "breaking" any of the
rules of refereeing.
 
And if Pierre is found to be incompetent as a referee by the NC!!, how do
you think referees as a community would react?  As I understand it, Pierre
has a great deal of respect from the other referees in the ECAC.
 
I don't think anybody is going to bring action against Pierre unless he makes
a call so blatantly wrong that the coach of the team that the call FAVORS
protests the call.  And how soon do you think that's going to happen?
 
--
Jeffrey "BJ" Anbinder                       [log in to unmask]
The Sexiest Man in Ithaca Radio             [log in to unmask]
 
"Who'd have thought?  William Kennedy Smith got off...
then he was acquitted!"      - Dennis Miller

ATOM RSS1 RSS2