HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Oct 1994 11:44:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I wrote:
>It does raise another question, though.  Does the new practice of
>insuring bids to the reg season and tourney winners mean that the
>previous requirement for each conference to have two teams receive
>bids, is no longer there?  In other words, a conference could now
>receive only one bid if the same team wins both the reg season and
>tourney, and no other team earns an at-large bid?
 
What I should have realized was that Dave's answer was very clear.
His final sentence:
 
d>... If the two are one in the same, the committee will revert back to
d>the criteria to pick the second guaranteed league berth.
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
So each conference is still guaranteed 2 teams.  It's just that the
second team would be chosen by the same criteria that are used to
select any of the at-large teams - same as before.
 
Thanks, Dave, for pointing this out.
---                                                                   ---
Mike Machnik                                            [log in to unmask]
Cabletron Systems, Inc.                                    *HMM* 11/13/93
<<<<< Color Voice of the Merrimack Warriors (station TBA for 94-95) >>>>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2