HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Jan 1992 10:06:41 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Bob Schwartz writes:
 
[TCHCR sorted by schedule deleted]
 
>Some comments:
...
> * The solid block of WCHA-CCHA teams surprised me. While it seemed that
>   WCHA-CCHA teams generally beat HE-ECAC teams over the holidays, I thought
>   that, overall, inter-conference records were pretty even, with the
>   ECAC exception. Yet no HE team was able to crack that upper block. Not
>   having a schedule with me, could this be a result of HE teams playing a
>   greater percentage of their non-conference games against the ECAC? Could
>   OSU's tournament win be echoing throughout the schedule strength ratings,
>   given their lofty standings in the CCHA?
 
The "West" is 10-5-1 against the "East": the ECAC is 0-5 vs. the CCHA/WCHA
and HEA is 5-5-1. Oddly, Denver, Duluth and Michigan State account for all 6
non-wins.
 
Regarding the effect of OSU's win over Clarkson, see an upcoming mail entitled
"What-if".
 
> * Given that most inter-conference games have already been played, the
>   Eastern teams are screwed, TCHCR-wise.
 
As of the 1/18 games, 428 out of 690 games have been played (not counting the
Independent tourney). 62%. 254 of the 279 "connections" have been made, 91%.
There are not very many inter-league games left, and of the few remaining,
ZERO are between the "East" and the "West." It sure looks like the ECAC had
its chances, and it blew them.
 
Keith

ATOM RSS1 RSS2