Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 1995 16:15:13 CST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Regarding Michigan and Minnesota, John Haeussler stated that: "...the
general consensus among the Michigan section was that the Wolverines would
win 7 of 10 if they played on a regular basis."
Why? What evidence to support this "consensus" can you present? Now, if
you were to ask a section of Minnesota fans at a hockey game the same
question, they would probably say that Minnesota would win 8 or 9 out of 10
games, but the Minnesota fans would have a reason for saying that. The
past few years have shown how Minnesota/Michigan games usually turn out.
I don't recall Michigan being in the NCAA Final Four in the past few
years? Why? Wasn't Minnesota there? Oh yeah, they were. I hope not all
Michigan fans think as John Haeussler does.
Although I'm a Minnesota fan, I admit the truth: For example, I would
never say that Minnesota would beat Boston Univ. or Colorado College 7 of
10 games if they played on a regular basis. Why? Because I'm being
realistic, not a blind fan.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|