Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:21:35 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 12:01 PM 1-24-2001 -0500, Rick McAdoo wrote:
>Is this common in the prep ranks, to build an Olympic-sized ice
>surface? Are there other non-collegiate rinks that are this size, or do
>most use the smaller surface (which I have to believe is a lot
>cheaper.)
<snip>
>I know some of the recently-built college rinks have gone to the larger
>surface, particularly in the WCHA and UNH in Hockey East. Is this
>evidence of the increasing awareness and prestige of international
>competitions in hockey circles?
I've got to think that larger is the direction hockey in general is going,
or at least more ice surface/skater - witness the NHL's 5x5 overtime. It
also fits nicely with my preference for watching the game. I enjoy
watching a quick passing team, and the larger rink, IMHO, encourages speed
and skill. (Course, I have to admit a certain thrill at seeing a nice,
clean hipcheck at center ice...)
However, I would think that retrofitting all those old barns is going to be
an expensive proposition, if not impossible. I know Saint Lawrence
enlarged their sheet a few years back, and for my 2¢ worth, Appleton is a
great place to watch college hockey. But they had to take out some seating
to do it.
Does anyone still have a 185 foot sheet?
Joe
--------------------
Joe Makowiec can be reached at:
maÉÜŸ :[log in to unmask]
http://home.nycap.rr.com/makowiec/
|
|
|