HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ruppert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Ruppert <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Feb 1993 13:11:56 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Karen (at Miami University) writes:
 
 
>Also, to even suggest as the lawyers for the Colgate women have that
>they are not treated equally because only 32% of Colgate athletes are
>women while they account for 47% of the student body is ridiculous.
>This says that 68% of the women at Colgate participate in athletics
>which I would guess is not that unusual a percentage for women at any
>college.
 
Unless I am misunderstanding something, this information doesn't say
that 68% of the women at Colgate participate in athletics.  Unless we
are told the percentage of students at Colgate that are athletes, we
cannot deduce the percentage of women who are athletes.
 
If you like math, this is a nice exercise in conditional probability.
If W = "woman," A = "athlete" and P means "probability of," then we are
told that P(W|A) = .32 (this is the conditional probability that a
student is a woman given that this student is an athlete) and
P(W)=.47.  If P(W) is known, then we can calculate
 
                P(A|W) = P(W|A) P(A) / P(W),
 
which is the percentage of women who are athletes.
 
 
David Ruppert
 
Cornell '70
UVM '73
Michigan State '77

ATOM RSS1 RSS2