HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pam Sweeney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Mar 1992 11:05:17 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Mark Daly writes:
>Overall, I won't have a particular problem with the two entries from each
>conference most years, as it still leaves the selection committee with
>some flexibility in rewarding stronger conferences with more bids
>(e.g., Hockey East's 4 last year while every other conference still got
>at least two bids) but perhaps the solution would be to expand to 16
>teams, thereby assuring that no worthy teams will be left out due
>to automatic bid requirements (much the same reason the basketball tourney
>now has 64 teams...conference strength disparity + many automatic bids =
>tournament expansion).
>
>Mark Daly
>[log in to unmask]
>
 
Unfortunately 16 teams is not an option.  That would be too many for the
number of teams that play Div I Hockey.  Thus sayeth the NC$$.
 
Pam Sweeney
Go Gophers!!!
WCHA Champs!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2