Regarding the first disallowed Colgate goal last night, Bill F. writes:
 
>     A minute and a half later, Colgate was at it again, as they came across
>     the blue line in a 3-on-2, which quickly became a 2-on-1.  Dufresne
>     tried to keep a Colgate player from getting to the net but succeeded
>     only in giving him a sort of weak shove, so that the player (I think it
>     was Sam Raffoul) was right on the doorstep for the centering feed, and
>     he put the puck past Bandurski at 4:12 of the first.  However, the ref-
>     erees ruled that he had kicked it in, and the goal was disallowed.
>     From where I was sitting, it looked like the puck hit the blade of his
>     stick, but I was to the left of the net, which put me directly behind
>     the alleged goal-scorer.  Nevertheless, the Red Raiders were mighty
>     upset.
 
        I, on the other hand, was to the right of the net, which gave a very
clear view of the puck hitting Raffoul's skate.  An argument could be made that
the contact (and re-direction) with the puck was unintentional.  That's
 referee's
judgment, however-  None the less, from section D, the puck clearly hit skate,
 not
stick.
 
        The other disallowed goals were shaky, at best, especially the net off
of its moorings, where from my position, it seemed that the puck was in prior
to Bandurski's moving the net.  All in all, between disallowed goals, and
Bandurski's stellar play, the final score was probably closer than Cornell
deserved.  I hope to see a sharper, more intense Big Red Friday against
Air Force-
 
 
Joel Graber
Michigan Tech '87                           Let's Go Tech!!!
Cornell '93                                 Let's Go Red!!!