HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ryan G. Stone" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ryan G. Stone
Date:
Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:18:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Steve asked what the rationale is behind not keeping 4-4 where coincidental
penalties would be put on the clock.  The rationale given at the NCAA/ECAC/HE
Officials Meeting in Andover, MA last week, was that the object was to get as
many players playing at one time as possible, thus you allow 5 players to play
per side on coincidental penalties as opposed to 4 per side, 2 more players
playing 2 (or more) more minutes.
	Personally, I like 3-3, 4-4, 4-3 and I am glad the NHL is playing that
way this year, but from the standpoint of allowing more participation, this
actually makes some sense.
 
-Ryan Stone
 Lawrence University (Appleton, WI) '93
 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute '93
 
 ----------------------------------   --------------------------------------
| RYAN G. STONE                    | | "In the Beginning, there was a Great |
| 113 Hall Hall, R.P.I.            | |  Void.  Then God said 'Let there be  |
| Troy, NY   12180-3590            | |  Light!'  There was still a Great    |
| (518) 276-7598                   | |  Void, but at least He could see it."|
| e-mail: [log in to unmask]          | |                   -Source Unknown    |
 ----------------------------------   --------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2