First of all, it sounds like BCST does more of the work for
the schools that AudioNet (I've been using the name when discussing
history) used to, at least as of two years ago when I last checked.
 
Adam Wodon says:
 
> I'll continue to stress the need to create incentives
>for third-party producers by ensuring they will have exclusive Internet
>"rights"
[...]
>In addition, the other thing that I believe will make Broadcast.Com take the
>next leap is the ability to easily charge money for the service.
 
        Okay, I may sound like the Citizen's Committee for Free TV,
but right now if Cornell plays RPI I can listen to the Cornell feed
or the RPI one, both for free.  According you your plan, I'd have
fewer choices and have to pay for it.  Excuse me if I don't get
excited about the future of the internet.  Now, to me, "original
content" does not mean obtaining exclusive rights to something that
used to be unrestricted; if you want techno-fans on board, try
developing something new, like video.  (And without inserting TV
timeouts!)
                                         John Whelan, Cornell '91
                                               <[log in to unmask]>
                      <http://www.cc.utah.edu/~jtw16960/joe.html>
 
Attention ECAC:   Eight is Enough--Flush the Final Five!
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.