On Wed, 22 Mar 1995, Alan Harder wrote:
 
> >>>>> " " == Arthur Berman <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>
>  > Obviously you are entitled to your opinion, but the convention, I
>  > believe for all conferences in Div. I, is to designate the
>  > tournament winner the league champion, and the regular season
>  > winner is just that.  I have posted my feelings about not letting
>  > everyone into the tournaments before so won't get into them again.
>  > However, we should not post the way we feel things *should* be as
>  > facts, but as opinions.  This is a discussion group after all :-)
>
> Okay, you're probably right.  LSSU is the CCHA champion, and Michigan
> is the Regular season champion.  It is a *fact* that my *opinion* is
> that the regular season championship means a great deal more than
> postseason money, er, tournament does.  So, in my opinion, LSSU can
> call themselves the CCHA champs, and the CCHA can call LSSU the CCHA
> champs, and everyone involved in college hockey can call LSSU the CCHA
> champs, but us UM fans know who the *real* CCHA champs were this year.
>
> But I'm probably just a wee little bit biased.
>
>
> -Alan Harder
>  [log in to unmask]
>  Go Blue!
>
 
 
We're not too particular whether we're called League Champs or Playoff
Champs or just Champs. That trophy looks pretty cool with the rest of them!
 
Tim
LSSU '88
 
GO LAKERS!!!!