>>>>> " " == Arthur Berman <[log in to unmask]> writes:
 
 > Obviously you are entitled to your opinion, but the convention, I
 > believe for all conferences in Div. I, is to designate the
 > tournament winner the league champion, and the regular season
 > winner is just that.  I have posted my feelings about not letting
 > everyone into the tournaments before so won't get into them again.
 > However, we should not post the way we feel things *should* be as
 > facts, but as opinions.  This is a discussion group after all :-)
 
Okay, you're probably right.  LSSU is the CCHA champion, and Michigan
is the Regular season champion.  It is a *fact* that my *opinion* is
that the regular season championship means a great deal more than
postseason money, er, tournament does.  So, in my opinion, LSSU can
call themselves the CCHA champs, and the CCHA can call LSSU the CCHA
champs, and everyone involved in college hockey can call LSSU the CCHA
champs, but us UM fans know who the *real* CCHA champs were this year.
 
But I'm probably just a wee little bit biased.
 
 
-Alan Harder
 [log in to unmask]
 Go Blue!