On Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Andrew Weise wrote:
 
> I'm in no way attempting to justify that Clarkson "deserves" a #2 seed. Yes,
> they won the ECAC regular season. Yes, they are a talented, experienced, and
> well-coached (IMO) hockey-team. Yes, they are one of the top 6 or 7 teams
> in the country. But, I had never imagined, in my wildest fantasies, that
> Clarkson would get a #2 east seed this year. Maine and BU are clearly the
> top 2 teams in the east, with UNH coming in a close third.
 
> Seriously, we are going to have to accept what the committee decides.
>
> =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
> +  Andy Weise                 Let's Go Tech!!     [log in to unmask]  +
> =  SUNY Potsdam '93                                                       =
> +  Union College '95?         Let's Go U!!        [log in to unmask] +
> +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
>
I imagine the committee giving Clarkson a bye is easier to accept for
someone who has "Let's Go Tech" in his signature line.
 
If we use the basketball tournament as an analogy it is clear that an
automatic bid is not the same thing as automatic seeding.
 
Arthur Berman [log in to unmask]
GO BU!!!