HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy J Hurley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1993 22:32:22 GMT
Organization:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask] (Robert H. Gross) writes:
 
|> Tom Fischer wrote ------------
|> I've heard a rumor that the Harvard equipment manager forgot to bring
|> the teams sticks to Dartmouth, which may have been a factor in the game.
|> ----------------- end of quote
|>
|> Well... I've got to respond. Harvard certainly had sticks at the game and
|> appeared to have as many sticks as most teams have. Correct me if I'm, wrong,
|> but it seems likely that the players have more control over the game than the
|> sticks. Dartmouth deserves some credit here! I know this might be hard to
|> believe, but the 4-3 game truly reflected the play. It was a pretty even game
|> and Dartmouth, once again, eked out a one goal victory. In other words,
|> Dartmouth earned a win against Harvard by playing good solid hockey.
|>
|> Bob Gross
 
 
 But the fact that Harvard was playing with sticks off the rack can't be
ignored. It does make a significant difference. That difference may not
have caused Harvard to loss, but it sure didn't help them to win.
 
 
 
                          -Tim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2