HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Klein, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:04:00 PST
Reply-To:
"Klein, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Don't these arguments get a little silly?
Eric probably sees more WCHA hockey than CCHA hockey over the course of a
season.
Perhaps if he saw more, he get make a more complete and fair assessment.
Hey folks: College hockey is good stuff! ECAC, HE, CCHA, WCHA and
inter-conference.
Let's celebrate the game and not be so provincial.
Steve Klein
 ------------
 > On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, Alan Harder wrote:
>> >>>>> " " == Eric J Burton <[log in to unmask]> writes: The
>> Wcha is pound per pound a better conference, I think this why you
>> saw some many teams in the Playoffs from our Division.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2