HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David M. Josselyn" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David M. Josselyn
Date:
Wed, 8 Dec 1993 17:26:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On Wed, 8 Dec 1993, Danzer wrote:
 
> Remember that CHODR is based on offense and defense, NOT on record.
> BC is ranked highly because of their impressive AVG. Goals for -
> goals against.  I believe they are about #4 in the country in that
> category.  BU has also been playing well lately, but started relatively
> poorly early on.  Usually there are a few teams that show drastic
> discrepencies between goals and records.  BC is a good example.
> Plus, they have the home ice advantage.
>
> They might even win !!!
>
> Tim
 
I did not mean to suggest that the CHODR system is at fault here; i
understand that systems like CHODR, PHOENIX, and TCHCR only have certain
amounts of quantitative data to work with.  I just thought I'd enter a
counter-prediction:  BU by at least 2 goals.
 
BTW, so far the CHODR seems to be on the money with most of its
predictions, IMHO.  Keep it up!  And no, I don't think there are too many
computer rating systems.  Variety is the spice of life.
 
David M. Josselyn
[log in to unmask]
 
GO MERRIMACK!  GO ARGUS!  /\
                         /  \
                        /(*) \
                       /      \
                      /________\

ATOM RSS1 RSS2