 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 1992 09:19:39 CST |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like to thank the people who have been patiently pointing out
my errors as I have struggled to get RPICH out to the list. For some
reason I decided it was really important to post RPICH yesterday, and
managed to overlook two glaring errors in the process. The first error
was a misstatement of how Winning Percentage is calculated. The second
error resulted in a set of erroneous figures, the most obvious of which
was a record of 4-2-11 for Yale. I seem to have everything in order now,
so I present, with some trepidation, the corrected RPICH.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rating Percentage Index for College Hockey, compiled by Erik Biever
RPICH is an attempt to rate college hockey teams by objective methods.
The formula is that used as one of the tools for evaluating teams for
the national tournaments in college baseball, basketball, and hockey.
RPICH is calculated by summing each team's winning percentage, the
average winning percentage of its opponents, and the average winning
percentage of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by 20%, 40%, and
40% respectively. Factors such as home ice and margin of victory are
not included. Only the 201 Division 1 games through 11/30/92 are
included.
RPICH IS BASED ON SCORES COMPILED AND CALCULATIONS PERFORMED
INDEPENDENT OF THE NCAA AND ANY AGENTS THEREOF.
Opp OppOpp
G W L T Win% Win% Win% RPICH
1 Maine 10 9- 0- 1 .9500 .5292 .5905 .6379
2 Michigan 11 7- 2- 2 .7273 .6056 .5127 .5928
3 Alaska-Fairbanks 9 6- 3- 0 .6667 .5762 .5435 .5812
4 Miami 12 9- 2- 1 .7917 .5330 .5173 .5784
5 Minnesota-Duluth 10 7- 3- 0 .7000 .5475 .5130 .5642
6 Denver 10 7- 2- 1 .7500 .5144 .5197 .5637
7 Alaska-Anchorage 6 5- 1- 0 .8333 .3792 .6098 .5623
8 Harvard 7 5- 1- 1 .7857 .4963 .4908 .5520
9 Boston College 10 3- 4- 3 .4500 .7343 .4165 .5503
10 St Lawrence 8 6- 1- 1 .8125 .4531 .5103 .5479
11 Providence 11 4- 6- 1 .4091 .6755 .4813 .5446
12 Lake Superior 9 6- 1- 2 .7778 .3994 .5448 .5332
13 Boston University 8 3- 4- 1 .4375 .6317 .4712 .5286
14 UMass-Lowell 11 8- 3- 0 .7273 .4130 .5444 .5284
15 Western Michigan 11 6- 4- 1 .5909 .4943 .5286 .5274
16 St Cloud 10 5- 5- 0 .5000 .5375 .5284 .5263
17 Ferris State 8 2- 4- 2 .3750 .6194 .5023 .5237
18 Wisconsin 12 7- 4- 1 .6250 .4847 .4902 .5150
19 Yale 7 3- 3- 1 .5000 .5159 .5169 .5131
20 Northeastern 9 6- 3- 0 .6667 .4638 .4827 .5120
21 RPI 7 3- 2- 2 .5714 .4438 .5446 .5096
22 New Hampshire 10 4- 4- 2 .5000 .4700 .5471 .5068
23 Michigan State 10 6- 3- 1 .6500 .4720 .4652 .5049
24 Vermont 10 5- 4- 1 .5500 .4610 .5103 .4985
25 Minnesota 12 5- 3- 4 .5833 .4495 .4999 .4964
26 Brown 7 3- 4- 0 .4286 .5119 .4926 .4875
27 Clarkson 8 4- 3- 1 .5625 .4069 .5103 .4794
28 North Dakota 12 3- 9- 0 .2500 .5938 .4771 .4784
29 Merrimack 10 3- 6- 1 .3500 .5223 .4799 .4709
30 Army 2 1- 1- 0 .5000 .3194 .6066 .4704
31 Cornell 5 1- 3- 1 .3000 .5248 .4786 .4614
32 Michigan Tech 12 5- 7- 0 .4167 .4347 .5079 .4604
33 Bowling Green 13 5- 8- 0 .3846 .4782 .4616 .4528
34 Northern Michigan 12 3- 7- 2 .3333 .5014 .4594 .4510
35 Ohio State 10 2- 7- 1 .2500 .5317 .4680 .4499
36 Kent 10 4- 6- 0 .4000 .3917 .5264 .4473
37 Colorado College 11 3- 8- 0 .2727 .4705 .4730 .4319
38 Princeton 5 2- 3- 0 .4000 .3417 .5332 .4300
39 Dartmouth 6 1- 5- 0 .1667 .5136 .4580 .4220
40 Notre Dame 13 1-11- 1 .1154 .5266 .4636 .4191
41 Union 5 1- 4- 0 .2000 .4789 .4403 .4077
42 Air Force 7 1- 5- 1 .2143 .4333 .4687 .4037
43 Illinois-Chicago 10 2- 7- 1 .2500 .3533 .4938 .3889
44 Colgate 6 0- 6- 0 .0000 .5016 .4604 .3848
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Erik Biever GO GOPHERS!
[log in to unmask] / [log in to unmask] / [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
