HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kevin J. Cummings" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Apr 91 13:27:24 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Mike Manchik writes:
> Pete Kester writes:
> >Bowdoin's regular season record was 19-3-1 (17-2-1 ECAC III) while
> >Merrimack was undefeated within the division.  Bowdoin came in to
> >avenge a 6-3 loss at home to Merrimack in the regular season.
>
>     Merrimack wasn't undefeated; they were 15-2 in the ECAC East, having
>     lost at Union, 6-3, on 1/28/89 and at AIC, 5-2, on 2/13/89.  The
>     Bowdoin win gave them a 16-2 record in their final year in the ECAC East,
>     outscoring the opponents 135-34, and going 27-7 overall.
 
Mike, if you read what Pete wrote, he said that Merrimack was undefeated
"within the division".  That means that Merrimack did not lose any games to
any other ECAC East teams.  He was conceeding that Merrimack may have lost
some games to other teams with the conference (ECAC West), or even the league
(ECAC North or South, but that would have been unlikely since ECAC East and
West are/were ECAC Div 2, while North and South are/were ECAC Div. 3), or even
any Div I teams they may have played.  I know that when the NCAA eliminated
Div 2 Hockey (at the NCAA level) that things got a little (more) confusing
here in the East (read: ECAC).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2