In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask] (Norman Blanchard) writes:
|> i'd like to thank mike machnik for saving me the trouble of writing a
|> cohesive, thoughtful analysis of the tournament picture by doing it himself!
|> just a quick question to the fellow from RPI who picked Harvard as the top
|> seed in the East - on what basis, average SAT?  and RPI third seed in the
|> East?  come now!  I think UM-Lowell has proven consistently throughout the year
|> that they have elevated themselves (at least until Roli graduates) into the
|> Eastern upper echelon along with BU, Harvard, Maine, and no one else.  I hate
|> to be a Hockey East snob, I just call 'em as I see 'em.
|>
|> Norm
|> Go Terriers!
 
 
 I agree with Harvard being the #2 seed and  BU being #1 seed, but
  after RPI beat U-MASS LOWELL 11-3 in RPI ivitational I think
 RPI has as much right (if not more) as LOWELL does to be a #3 seed