Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:48:43 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Having gone to Anaheim, I appreciate the hockey finals being in a place
that can also be made into a reasonable vacation. Going to upstate New
York in early April might be fun the first time, but then it starts to
lose it's appeal. The variation alone provided by warm-weather venues
is a welcome change.
I don't even know what "play the games where they were meant to be
played" means. I guess that means it should only be played where NCAA
Division I teams existed while Brian was in college? Hockey has
certainly been played in California for quite a while (NHL since the
late '60s, I believe).
Jim
--- "Anthony J. Buffa" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, this seemed to be the attitude after Anaheim of most folks that
> usually go, forgetting there are a large fraction of colleg ehockey
> fans
> that support their teams in warmer climates. I am guessing with this
> attitude being so prevalent, it will never happen, so no need to
> worry.
>
> Tony Buffa
> RPI '64
>
> =====
>
> Brian Wilantowicz wrote:
> >
> > I for one have no desire to travel to Phoenix or CA for that matter
> to
> > see a hockey game. Let's play the games where they were meant to
> be
> > played...just my opinion.
> >
> > By the way, does anyone know where the next few (2003 & beyond)
> final
> > fours/regionals will be held? How about bringing it to NYC??? If
> I
> > can't get a game on TV at least I could hop on the train and see it
> > live...
> >
> > Another question...When do tickets go on sale for the regionals?
> Did I
> > miss something??? You would think I would remember this by now...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
|
|
|