Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Mar 1998 11:49:46 -0700 |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 664 games played through 03/01/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
Weight 35% 50% 15%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 Michigan State 34 26- 4- 4 82.35 ( 2) 51.36 (13) 50.83 (14) 62.13
2 North Dakota 32 26- 5- 1 82.81 ( 1) 50.61 (20) 51.62 ( 2) 62.03
3 Boston University 31 24- 5- 2 80.65 ( 3) 51.50 (11) 50.51 (23) 61.55
4 Michigan 34 24- 9- 1 72.06 ( 5) 52.27 ( 9) 50.91 (12) 58.99
5 New Hampshire 30 21- 8- 1 71.67 ( 6) 50.94 (16) 50.38 (24) 58.11
6 Boston College 32 20- 8- 4 68.75 ( 7) 50.54 (22) 51.24 ( 5) 57.02
7 Yale 27 20- 6- 1 75.93 ( 4) 44.30 (41) 48.37 (42) 55.98
8 Clarkson 27 17- 7- 3 68.52 ( 8) 49.16 (32) 48.94 (30) 55.90
9 St Cloud 30 17-11- 2 60.00 (13) 53.83 ( 4) 50.96 (10) 55.56
10 Ohio State 32 19-11- 2 62.50 (10) 50.78 (18) 50.98 ( 8) 54.91
11 Colorado College 34 20-11- 3 63.24 ( 9) 49.22 (30) 50.86 (13) 54.37
12 Miami 33 18-11- 4 60.61 (12) 50.59 (21) 51.30 ( 4) 54.20
13 Wisconsin 32 19-12- 1 60.94 (11) 49.40 (29) 52.04 ( 1) 53.83
14 Northeastern 32 18-12- 2 59.38 (14) 49.20 (31) 50.79 (15) 53.00
15 Minnesota-Duluth 32 15-15- 2 50.00 (20) 53.72 ( 5) 50.58 (21) 51.95
16 Maine 28 12-13- 3 48.21 (26) 53.92 ( 3) 50.58 (22) 51.42
17 Notre Dame 36 16-16- 4 50.00 (20) 52.34 ( 8) 50.96 (11) 51.31
18 Northern Michigan 33 15-14- 4 51.52 (18) 50.73 (19) 50.96 ( 9) 51.04
19 Colgate 29 14-11- 4 55.17 (17) 48.36 (35) 48.65 (35) 50.79
20 Lake Superior 33 15-14- 4 51.52 (18) 50.25 (24) 50.64 (19) 50.75
21 Rensselaer 29 15-10- 4 58.62 (15) 45.05 (39) 48.82 (32) 50.37
22 Princeton 25 11- 8- 6 56.00 (16) 46.38 (37) 48.77 (34) 50.10
23 Ferris State 34 15-16- 3 48.53 (25) 50.81 (17) 50.59 (20) 49.98
24 Providence 33 15-15- 3 50.00 (20) 49.97 (25) 49.86 (26) 49.97
25 Mass Lowell 31 13-15- 3 46.77 (28) 51.27 (14) 49.43 (27) 49.42
26 Minnesota 34 14-20- 0 41.18 (31) 54.77 ( 2) 50.79 (16) 49.42
27 Cornell 26 12-12- 2 50.00 (20) 49.09 (33) 48.50 (37) 49.32
28 Brown 26 11-14- 1 44.23 (30) 51.46 (12) 48.85 (31) 48.54
29 Michigan Tech 32 13-16- 3 45.31 (29) 49.67 (26) 51.40 ( 3) 48.41
30 Harvard 27 9-16- 2 37.04 (34) 54.83 ( 1) 48.45 (41) 47.65
31 Denver 32 11-19- 2 37.50 (33) 53.17 ( 6) 50.09 (25) 47.22
32 Mankato State 28 12-13- 3 48.21 (26) 45.48 (38) 48.49 (39) 46.89
33 Dartmouth 27 11-11- 5 50.00 (20) 44.13 (42) 48.55 (36) 46.85
34 Vermont 30 10-17- 3 38.33 (32) 48.91 (34) 48.80 (33) 45.19
35 Western Michigan 37 10-25- 2 29.73 (36) 52.26 (10) 50.69 (17) 44.14
36 Alaska-Fairbanks 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 49.56 (28) 51.15 ( 7) 43.39
37 St Lawrence 27 6-19- 2 25.93 (38) 52.82 ( 7) 48.48 (40) 42.75
38 Merrimack 32 8-23- 1 26.56 (37) 50.43 (23) 49.19 (28) 41.89
39 Alaska-Anchorage 34 6-23- 5 25.00 (39) 49.65 (27) 51.20 ( 6) 41.25
40 Bowling Green 35 6-26- 3 21.43 (42) 51.05 (15) 50.67 (18) 40.63
41 Mass Amherst 29 5-22- 2 20.69 (43) 47.97 (36) 48.97 (29) 38.57
42 Union 28 5-20- 3 23.21 (41) 44.37 (40) 48.49 (38) 37.58
43 Air Force 12 3- 9- 0 25.00 (39) 36.93 (44) 46.55 (43) 34.19
44 Army 17 2-15- 0 11.76 (44) 43.77 (43) 45.62 (44) 32.85
Average 49.27 49.70 49.87 49.58
Standard Deviation 17.75 3.41 1.37 6.84
range 11.76 36.93 45.62
to 82.81 54.83 52.04
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
This calculation includes only teams eligible for the NCAA tournament.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|