Steven Czuba <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I was just thinking .. , and I should be working.
>
>Clarkson's fate is already determined. Clarkson is in no matter what.
>
>And if another team wins the ECAC tourney the point is moot also, since
>Clarkson and that other team are in.
>
>The questions come up if Clarkson wins the tourney and RPI/Colgate/Princeton
>(and Brown??) are left scrambling for the second spot. Given that, IMO :
>
>RPI beats Colgate , Princeton is in based on RPICH and H2H.
>Colgate beats RPI , Colgate sneaks in despite losing to Princeton twice this
>year.
 
Actually, I think Princeton beat Colgate three times this year (once in the
Dexter Classic at U Maine). Would this change anything? Of the teams left
in the ECACs other than Clarkson, Princeton dominates head-to-head: 3-0-0
v. Colgate, 1-0-1 v RPI (including a 9-1 pummeling). I understand a lot of
weight is put on RPICH, but it seems to me that if you're going to take two
ECAC teams and Princeton plays respectably v. Clarkson, then the second
team ought to be Princeton (assuming Clarkson goes on to win tourney). I
don't know-- it's obvious that I badly want these guys to go the NCAAs. Any
way they can get there would make me happy (an ECAC tourney championship
would be nice, though).
 
Also, anyone know of TV coverage in the Philly/Central Jersey Area for the
ECAC final four?
 
Dan Kearney '96
Princeton University