HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Blackburn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Blackburn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 1995 22:33:53 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
> I would certainly not have the audacity to second-guess Bob Gaudet,
who I think
> should win ECAC coach of the year, but I had a thought regarding the
team's goaltending situation.
> Granted, Parsons lost Game 1 of the series against Princeton and then
the
> backup (his name eludes me) won the second game to force Game 3.
Granted, the
> backup bailed out the team, but still....Parsons was nothing short of
brilliant
> for a good part of the regular season and was "the man" through thick
and thin.
> Might Gaudet have erred by not going back to him for Game 3?
>
> Of course, this may sound weak, given they only came one goal away
from
> advancing, but I can't help but think Parsons would've given them a
better shot
> against Princeton.
 
No Way!  Sorry, you welcomed flames, so I've got one.
 
Mike Parsons played spectacurlarly for the first 9/10th of the season,
and was a major reason Brown was able to finish in second place with an
over-acheiving team.  But, as a result of his performances at RPI, vs.
Clarkson, and in game 1 against Princeton, it was clear that Brian
Audette had to be the man.  Parsons was struggling, he had lost his
confidence, and I might even venture to say that (especially after game
2) his teammates' confidence lay with Audette.  He was rattled and
giving up fluke goals and failing to make simple saves.
 
**This is NOT to say that Mike Parsons should be blamed for any of
Brown's late-season failures**
 
However, the simple fact is that Audette gave Brown their best chance to
win.  He showed in the final regular-season game against SLU and in the
previous game against Princeton that he could handle to pressures and
responsiblities that go with being the starting goalie in the play-offs,
while Parsons failed to show that he could handle the tight,
pressure-ridden play-off situations.  In fact, if I were to question any
of gaudet's goaltending decisions, it would be starting Parsons in game
1.  But, I give him that, as he needed to give Parsons a chance to
redeem himself.
 
David Blackburn
Brown Univesity '98

ATOM RSS1 RSS2