Eric,
        Apparently, you have already made your mind up about how
"pathetic" the ECAC is, even though I suspect that most of your knowledge
of the league is based on the records and/or power ratings of its teams.
However, I'm not going to argue about this.  I just want remind everyone
of the purpose of Hockey-L, which is intelligent discussion; NOT to voice
opinions on which teams, players, schools, or leagues are "pathetic"
(refer to your "Usage Guidelines for Hockey-L" file).  If you have such
opinions, fine.  But keep them to yourself and keep them off Hockey-L
because all it does is antagonize people on the list.  Can we please try
to get along?
 
Sincerely,
Tony Garcia
 
On Mon, 27 Feb 1995, Eric J Burton wrote:
 
> On Mon, 27 Feb 1995, C. Sammy Hager wrote:
>
> > Final ECAC standings after this weekend
> > 1) Clarkson             13-6-3  29
> > 2) Brown                13-7-2  28
> > 3) Harvard              13-8-1  27
> > 4) Vermont              11-9-2  24
> > 5) Colgate              11-9-2  24
> > 6) Princeton            10-9-3  23
> > 7) RPI                  10-9-3  23
> > 8) Cornell              9-10-3  21
> > 9) St. Lawrence         10-12-0 20
> > 10)Dartmouth            7-13-2  16
> > 11)Union                6-12-4  16
> > 12)Yale                 6-13-3  15
>
> I would take anybody in the WCHA over these teams. This is patetic
> When I look at he Power rating I shake my head. Hell Play some games
> against someone tough...
>