HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Jan 1995 14:00:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
>
>         At the end of Saturday's MTU/ND game their were penalties called
 against
> both teams.  MTU's Prokopeitz recieved 2 for roughing 2 for high sticking and
> a 10 minute misconduct.  ND's player only receives a 2 minute roughing call.
> To the best of my understanding the teams should have skated 5 on 4 with
> ND having a 2 minute powerplay.  However, instead the teams skated 4 on 3.
> The score board read  2 minutes for ND, and on MTU's side their was a 2 minute
> penalty on the board and a 4 minute penaalty on the board (note that these two
> penalties had the same number 19 Figliomini as the man serving the penalty.)
> Then ND scored a powerplay goal with about 20 seconds or so left in the game,
> the teams skated 4 on 4 and MTU's 2 minute penalty was removed form the board.
> Could somebody please either explain this to my as to why these penalties were
> served this way or point me out a rule in the rule book I could look up.
>
from the Box:
                P19 UND-9 Naumenko (2-Rough)    19:25
                P20 MTU-11 Prokopetz (2-Rough)  19:25
                P21 MTU-12 Prokopetz (2-High Stick)     19:25
                                     Served by Figliomeni
                P22 MTU-13 Prokopetz (10-Misconduct)    19:25
 
 
They were coincidentals while skating 5-5 that took them down to 4-4.  then the
extra 2 min resulted in a ND powerplay, reducing it to a 4-3
 
Prokoepeitz received 4 min and ND received 2 min.  They put 2 min on the clock
for ND and 2 min up for MTU. (These were the coincidentals).  Then they should
have put up 2 more minutes for 11 as the second penalty, instead they accidently
 put up 4 minutes. (they put 19 on both, he just served the
second penalty) With the 10 min misconduct Prokopeitz received, he was sent
to the locker room (no chance for him to play again that game) so instead of
MTU having 2 men in the box there was only Figliomini serving the second
penalty.  When ND scored, the second penalty on #11 came off the board and
figliomini (#19) came out of the box, and the coincidentals were left, thus
the teams skated 4-4.
 
The confusion comes that #11 should have been put up not #19 (figi only
served the penalty) and they accidently put up 4 min instead of 2 on the clock
for the second one. plus the fact that we only had one man physically
in the box.
 
Still confused?  I had to think about that one also... ;-)
 
Bob
 
 
 
> Thanks
> John Kupiszewski
> MTU
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2