HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
The College Hockey Computer Rating <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Apr 91 09:36:42 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
David Halonen asks:
>As a loyal Michigan Tech fan, I've been taking some abuse the last couple of
>seasons.  MTU just hasn't done that well.  Except that this past year was a
>marked improvement over the year before.  So my question is:  according to the
>computer ranking, was MTU the most improved team?
>
>Also, who dived the most (number of positions), who was the most consistant,
>etc...
 
Good questions. These all sound like fun things to do in the off-season.
Here is what I intend to do with TCHCR over the next few months:
 
  o Apply the current algorithm to the 86-7, 87-8, 88-9 and 89-90 seasons.
  o Improve the algorithm to quelch some of the "complaints". This will
    include:
             -- Rewarding defensive teams more
             -- Not forcing ratings to go from 0 to 100
  o Anything else you all want; just ask (send mail to either address below!)
 
 
Keith
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2