HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Eric Burton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:16:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>
> There are a few of things that are pleasing to me.  First, I can remember
> when North Dakota was virtually ALL Canadian.  Given that North Dakota is
> sparsely populated, and of the contiguous states, only Minnesota has many
> hockey players, the geographic distribution is pretty impressive.
 
My first question is who cares where they are from does it make a difference
that they are all Candian or ND or Minnesota. This argument has really been
beaten to death. Because ND had more candians in their line up then B.C. does
that make it less legit?
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2