Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 1998 17:38:16 -0700 |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
as of now, maine gets the 12th spot...
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey PAIRWISE COMPARISONS
based on 748 games played through 03/20/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
index team games win % last 20 being considered rpi won
----- ---- ----- ----- ------- ---------------- --- ---
1 North Dakota 37 82.43 85.00 (11- 5- 1) 67.65 62.25 19
2 Michigan State 39 82.05 82.50 (10- 2- 3) 76.67 61.79 18
3 Boston University 36 77.78 80.00 (12- 5- 2) 68.42 59.50 17
4 Michigan 39 73.08 70.00 ( 7- 7- 0) 50.00 58.70 16
5 Clarkson 31 72.58 82.50 ( 4- 6- 1) 40.91 57.30 15
6 Boston College 37 71.62 80.00 ( 9- 6- 3) 58.33 57.80 14
7 Ohio State 36 66.67 77.50 ( 7- 6- 1) 53.57 56.13 13
8 New Hampshire 34 66.18 57.50 (11-10- 1) 52.27 55.98 11
9 Yale 33 74.24 72.50 ( 6- 2- 0) 75.00 55.08 11
10 Colorado College 38 67.11 67.50 ( 3- 9- 2) 28.57 54.91 10
11 Wisconsin 36 62.50 62.50 ( 8- 6- 1) 56.67 54.62 10
12 St Cloud 37 56.76 45.00 ( 7- 9- 0) 43.75 54.09 7
13 Maine 31 51.61 47.50 ( 7- 9- 3) 44.74 52.42 7
14 Northern Michigan 37 54.05 52.50 ( 7- 9- 1) 44.12 52.82 6
15 Minnesota-Duluth 38 52.63 60.00 ( 7- 8- 1) 46.88 51.57 5
16 Northeastern 37 55.41 47.50 ( 7-11- 2) 40.00 51.99 3
17 Miami 36 55.56 35.00 ( 5- 8- 2) 40.00 51.66 3
18 Princeton 32 57.81 55.00 ( 3- 4- 1) 43.75 50.96 3
19 Mass Lowell 35 50.00 55.00 ( 6-13- 2) 33.33 50.76 1
20 Rensselaer 34 55.88 60.00 ( 3- 5- 1) 38.89 49.94 1
Teams can earn points for each of the following criteria:
1. Head to head Competition (one point per game)
2. Record against common opponents
3. Record against teams under consideration
4. Record in last 20 games
5. Ratings percentage index
The record in the last 20 games, the record against teams
under consideration, the ratings percentage index, and
the number of pairwise comparisons won are listed above.
(for individual comparisons, subtract head to head record
from the overall 'being considered' record given above.)
The Ratings percentage index is used as a tiebreaker.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
Summaries of head to head competition results, record
against common opponents, and overall pairwise
comparisons are given in 3 tables below.
Head To Head (row team wins over column team)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 total
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----
1 North Dakota 3 3 3 2 11
2 Michigan State 4 2 1 2 1 10
3 Boston University 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 12
4 Michigan 3 1 2 1 7
5 Clarkson 1 1 1 1 4
6 Boston College 1 2 1 2 3 9
7 Ohio State 1 1 3 2 7
8 New Hampshire 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 11
9 Yale 1 2 1 2 6
10 Colorado College 2 1 3
11 Wisconsin 1 2 1 1 3 8
12 St Cloud 2 2 1 2 7
13 Maine 1 3 1 2 7
14 Northern Michigan 1 1 1 4 7
15 Minnesota-Duluth 2 1 1 3 7
16 Northeastern 1 1 2 2 1 7
17 Miami 2 1 1 1 5
18 Princeton 1 1 1 3
19 Mass Lowell 1 1 4 6
20 Rensselaer 1 1 1 3
Common Opponents ('<' - row wins '^' - column wins 't' - tie)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 North Dakota ^ < < < ^ t < < < < < < < < < < 13 2
2 Michigan State < ^ < ^ < < < < < < < < < ^ < < 13 3
3 Boston University t ^ < < < < < t < ^ < < ^ < < < 11 3
4 Michigan ^ < t < < ^ < < < < < < < < < < < ^ < 15 3
5 Clarkson ^ ^ < ^ < t < < t ^ ^ < < ^ < < < < < 11 6
6 Boston College < ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < ^ < < < < < < < < < 13 5
7 Ohio State ^ ^ ^ < t < ^ < < < ^ < ^ ^ < ^ ^ < 8 9
8 New Hampshire < ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < ^ t < < ^ < < < < < 10 7
9 Yale t ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ t ^ ^ < < ^ < < < 5 11
10 Colorado College ^ ^ ^ ^ t ^ < < < < < < < < ^ < < < 11 6
11 Wisconsin ^ ^ t ^ < < ^ t t ^ < t < < ^ < < t 7 6
12 St Cloud ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ t < < ^ ^ 3 10
13 Maine ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < ^ t t ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ < 4 13
14 Northern Michigan ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ < < ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ < < 6 12
15 Minnesota-Duluth ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ t t ^ < 4 13
16 Northeastern ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < ^ < ^ 9 10
17 Miami ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ < < ^ < < < t ^ < < < 9 8
18 Princeton ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ < t < ^ < t 4 10
19 Mass Lowell ^ < ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ < ^ < ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 11
20 Rensselaer ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ t ^ ^ ^ < ^ t < 2 14
Total points ('<' - row wins '^' - column wins)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 North Dakota < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 19 0
2 Michigan State ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 18 1
3 Boston University ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 17 2
4 Michigan ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 16 3
5 Clarkson ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 15 4
6 Boston College ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 14 5
7 Ohio State ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < < < 13 6
8 New Hampshire ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < ^ < < < < < < < < < 11 8
9 Yale ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < < 11 8
10 Colorado College ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < < 10 9
11 Wisconsin ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ < < < < < < < < < 10 9
12 St Cloud ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < < < < < 7 12
13 Maine ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < < < < < < 7 12
14 Northern Michigan ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < < < < < 6 13
15 Minnesota-Duluth ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < < < < 5 14
16 Northeastern ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < ^ ^ < 3 16
17 Miami ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < < < 3 16
18 Princeton ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ < < 3 16
19 Mass Lowell ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < ^ ^ ^ 1 18
20 Rensselaer ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < 1 18
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|