HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 1997 14:20:09 -0600
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Who has time to be organized?
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Lowell King wrote:
>
> This discussion brings up an interesting point. Where Shawn Walsh (Maine)
> called for double 'stick inspection' (hadn't ever heard of two being
> called at the same time before) what if the opposing team then called for
> stick inspection on Maine. Since they were already down two players, it
> wouldn't seem to make much difference whether they won or lost -- the
> number of active players would remain the same. Doesn't that create an
> interesting situation or does some rule prevent the recipient of the
> original rule from also initiating the same call?
>
> Lowell King
 
There is a cost.  If the challenge is wrong, a guy goes to the box.  His
penalty kicks in when at least one of the others is over.  Thus, if they
are scored upon on the 5-3, the other team still has a two-man
advantage.
 
At least this is the way that I would assume it works.
 
J. Michael Neal
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2