HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Abegg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:36:26 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Amazing how much can change in a weekend.  Miami and Maine move from
looking solidly in to just barely hanging on.  Denver moves from In to
probably Out.  Meanwhile BC and MSU take steps up the charts.  Right now
the committee's job would be fairly easy, with only 1 "host" school
involved.  Here's my take:

Who's in:
6 conference champions, for now, still using the regular season champs,
except in Atlantic hockey where RIT is not eligible to win the tournament,
so we'll use Sacred Heart, and CHA where UAH (!) is IN, gives us: Mn,
NoDame, UNH, SLU, SH, UAH.
10 remaining from PWR, using the .003 bonus: SCSU, Clarkson, BosC, BosU,
NoDak, Mich, MichSt, UMass, UMO (Maine), Mia.  The size of the bonus is
fairly important - if it's .005, MichTech is in and SLU is out, plus a
bunch of shuffling involving mostly Hockey East & CCHA schools.  Also if
the bonus is 0, Dartmouth is in and Maine is out - but it would be dumb to
declare that a bonus exists but has a value of 0!

Seeding 1-16 and raw pairings:
1 Mn       16 UAH
2 NoDam    15 SH/eventual Atlantic Hockey champ
3 SCSU     14 Mia
4 UNH      13 UMO (Maine)

5 Cla      12 SLU
6 BosC     11 UMA (UMass)
7 BosU     10 MSU
8 NoDak     9 Mich

1st round pairing adjustments:
3/13 SCSU/UMO
4/14 UNH/Mia (13&14 swapped to avoid 1st round UNH/UMO)
5/11 Cla/UMA
6/12 BC/SLU (11&12 swapped to avoid 1st rn BC/UMA and Cla/SLU)

That's pretty clean, two one-position swaps clear up the 3 problems.

Regional pairings:
4/14 UNH/Mia vs 5/11 Cla/UMA in MANCHESTER (UNH is host school)
3/13 SCSU/UMO vs 6/12 BC/SLU
2/15 NoDam/SH vs 7/10 BU/MSU
1/16 Mn/UAH vs 8/9 NDk/Mich

And who goes where?  As with last week, one of the 3 western top seeds
needs to go to Rochester.  Since last week we've lost DU and Nigara,
creating greater challenges for attendance in Rochester and Denver.  You
need SLU in Rochester (because it can't have Clarkson as long as they
should be paired with UNH) so SCSU/UMO/BC/SLU goes there, plus BC & Maine
should travel well enough to help that regional.  I suggest that
NoDam/SH/BU/MSU looks attractive for Grand Rapids and minimizes the travel
for Notre Dame, leaving Mn/UAH/NDk/Mich in Denver.

Lots of other possibilities, but they all involve scrambling the bracket
without (to me) obvious improvement in other areas: could flip 5/11 and
6/12, to put Clarkson & UMass in Rochester and move BC & St Lawrence to
Manchester.  Getting Michigan to Grand Rapids either means flipping 7/10
and 8/9 (replacing BU/MSU with NDk/Mich in Grand Rapids) or sending the
NDm/SH/BU/MSU bracket entirely to Denver, neither of which are better fits
to the "rules" (bracket integrity, top seeds close to home, attendance
matters).

This is still a snapshot of a moving target, but it's fun to look at and
ponder.  The possibilities are narrower now than before, but still wide.

Mike A

ATOM RSS1 RSS2