HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Wayne Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Nov 1991 08:50:51 EST
Reply-To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
 1. Maine (22)               3-0-0  246
 2. Michigan (1)             4-1-1  216
 3. Lake Superior State (1)  5-1-0  195
 4. Boston University (1)    4-0-0  150
 5. Clarkson                 2-1-0  144
 6. Wisconsin                6-2-0  121
 7. New Hampshire            5-0-0   67
 8. Northern Michigan        3-3-2   61
 9. Michigan State           3-0-2   53
10. Minnesota                4-4-0   36
 
P.S. On another subject, Dale Hennigar (sp?), supervisor of HE
     officials announced points of emphasis recently.  Most were of the
     nature that we have been discussing this fall (holding,
     interference, coach conduct, etc), but one had a slight twist.
 
     The rules (more-or-less) state that the icing is called if the puck
     is shot across the goal line without the puck having crossed the
     center ice red line.  Emphasis was to be on that rule this year.
     The HE emphasis will be that the puck *must reach* the red line,
     whereas in previous years icing was not called if the puck was shot
     from within 6 inches or so of reaching the red line.
 
     This sounds to me like the referees backing off an emphasis even
     *before* the season!  :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2