HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Mar 1995 21:21:44 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
Rating Percentage Index for College Hockey, compiled by Erik Biever
 
This report includes the 707 games through 03/05/95 between teams eligible
for the Division 1 tournament.
 
                                                 Opp     OppOpp
                         G    W  L  T    Win%    Win%    Win%   RPICH
 1  Boston University   34   25- 6- 3   .7794   .5325   .5096   .5885
 2  Michigan            33   26- 6- 1   .8030   .5240   .4954   .5866
 3  Maine               37   27- 4- 6   .8108   .5123   .5101   .5864
 4  New Hampshire       34   22- 8- 4   .7059   .5339   .5011   .5687
 5  Colorado College    38   27-10- 1   .7237   .5000   .5100   .5584
 6  Minnesota           36   19-12- 5   .5972   .5530   .5120   .5538
 7  Clarkson            31   19- 8- 4   .6774   .5004   .4979   .5441
 8  Wisconsin           36   19-13- 4   .5833   .5340   .5129   .5411
 9  Michigan State      34   21-10- 3   .6618   .5029   .4954   .5408
10  Denver              36   22-12- 2   .6389   .5029   .5167   .5403
11  Northeastern        34   16-13- 5   .5441   .5353   .5085   .5308
12  Bowling Green       34   22-10- 2   .6765   .4730   .4978   .5301
13  Vermont             32   18-12- 2   .5938   .4987   .4966   .5220
14  Lake Superior       34   17-11- 6   .5882   .4970   .4979   .5200
15  Brown               27   14-10- 3   .5741   .4992   .4920   .5161
16  North Dakota        36   16-17- 3   .4861   .5274   .5129   .5134
17  St Cloud            36   17-18- 1   .4861   .5237   .5121   .5114
18  Princeton           27   13-11- 3   .5370   .5009   .4937   .5081
19  Harvard             28   14-13- 1   .5179   .4955   .4985   .5018
20  Colgate             31   17-13- 1   .5645   .4744   .4926   .5015
21  Miami               36   16-14- 6   .5278   .4899   .4951   .5007
22  Michigan Tech       36   14-18- 4   .4444   .5222   .5107   .4999
23  Minnesota-Duluth    36   16-16- 4   .5000   .4882   .5155   .4980
24  Western Michigan    36   15-16- 5   .4861   .5061   .4923   .4977
25  St Lawrence         29   12-16- 1   .4310   .5313   .4950   .4971
26  RPI                 31   15-13- 3   .5323   .4795   .4872   .4946
27  Mass Lowell         37   16-17- 4   .4865   .4916   .4986   .4921
28  Providence          34   12-16- 6   .4412   .5032   .4982   .4865
29  Merrimack           33   13-15- 5   .4697   .4875   .4981   .4857
30  Boston College      34   11-21- 2   .3529   .5226   .5029   .4753
31  Cornell             25    9-12- 4   .4400   .4844   .4908   .4749
32  Ferris State        34   12-18- 4   .4118   .4849   .4982   .4700
33  Dartmouth           27    9-16- 2   .3704   .5042   .4974   .4690
34  Northern Michigan   36   11-22- 3   .3472   .5043   .5100   .4665
35  Illinois-Chicago    35   11-20- 4   .3714   .4839   .4966   .4589
36  Alaska-Anchorage    34   11-23- 0   .3235   .4912   .5125   .4546
37  Yale                28    8-17- 3   .3393   .4886   .4958   .4531
38  Union               27    8-15- 4   .3704   .4658   .4907   .4482
39  Notre Dame          33    9-23- 1   .2879   .4804   .4959   .4362
40  Alaska-Fairbanks    28    7-20- 1   .2679   .4891   .4872   .4333
41  Ohio State          33    5-26- 2   .1818   .4937   .4897   .4147
42  Mass Amherst        32    5-26- 1   .1719   .4863   .4981   .4106
43  Air Force           21    5-15- 1   .2619   .4062   .4839   .3896
44  Army                11    1-10- 0   .0909   .3690   .4734   .3256
 
RPICH is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method, used as a tool
in selecting teams for the national collegiate tournaments in basketball,
baseball, and hockey.  Ratings are derived by summing each team's winning
percentage, the average winning percentage of its opponents, and the average
winning percentage of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by 25%, 50%, and
25% respectively.  Factors such as home ice and margin of victory are not
included.  No individual game is weighted more heavily than any other.
 
Copyright 1995 Erik Biever.  RPICH is freely available for personal use;
republication without permission is prohibited.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2