HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Nielson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:49:40 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Why not simply split the ECAC along Ivy/non-Ivy lines? That would open up
all kinds of realignment possibilites in this pie-in-the-sky scenario.

-Todd
http://creasemonkeyhockey.blogspot.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John T Whelan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:51 AM
Subject: Geography


> I'm not so into these grand realignment ideas (although I think the
> ECAC could work as a 16-team league with four groups of four teams
> that rotated divisional pairings) but the following is a handy
> resource for visualizing the distribution of D1 college hockey teams:
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Chockey.PNG
>
>   John Whelan
>   Cornell '91

ATOM RSS1 RSS2