 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:20:11 -0400 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The "punishment" for icing is a faceoff right in front of your goalie. I
think that's appropriate and sufficient. Preventing fatigued players from
leaving the ice seems potentially dangerous.
In other words, I agree with John.
Anne
Cornell '85
PS: I think it's a huge compliment when a has to keep icing the puck just
to hang in with your team's offense. It can be a bit of a drag, because it
slows the game down, but the TV timeouts are much worse.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Roberts" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: a few of my favorite things....
> On Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:23 AM, John Whelan wrote
>
>>> Not allowing a line change after an icing is bogus, though.
>
> Icing the puck is a violation of the rules. Why should a team be allowed
> to
> benefit from violating the rules?
>
> Craig Roberts
> Wisconsin-Stevens Point '90
> Minnesota State (nee Mankato State) '97
>
|
|
|
