HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Sep 1998 10:33:48 EDT
Reply-To:
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Randy May <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
In a message dated 9/6/98 7:06:29 AM, [log in to unmask] writes:
 
<<Ah -
sorry about the bandwidth folks.  But can't they write rules that allow
flexibility for situations?>>
 
Actually, if you think about it....they can't. Then they would likely read
something like
 
"no player shall hold an opponent in a such a manner that actually impedes
that player from having the opportunity to score a goal".
 
Can you imagine the arguments this definition would create? As a sports
official that has worked up to the outskirts of the college level in both
lacrosse and football, I can say there is the book rule, and then there is the
game rule...and both can be quite different. That still creates problems of
course...but I think to a lesser extent.
 
Randy May
http://members.aol.com/Al20Secord/Choose.html
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2