Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 1996 08:52:05 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Responding to the message of <[log in to unmask]>
from Eric Carlson <[log in to unmask]>:
> Just what exactly does it take for the referee to actually grant one? I
> thought I heard that the option was granted in this case to take a minor
> penalty on the opposing team or a penalty shot. Is that right? Most
> power plays aren't much more successful than 20% or so. What is the
> likely percentage of successful penalty shot attempts? Anyone have any
> idea? I was pretty surprised to read that CCHA goalies had stopped 8 in
> a row. That means only 20% of the last 10 have been successful as
> well. So given a choice which one would you choose?
1. The NCAA defines a player with a breakaway as:
"a player in control of the puck with no opposition between the individual and
the opposing goal and with a reasonable scoring opportunity."
So, you can see that judgement comes into play.
2. Yes, a minor penalty can be accepted in lieu of the penalty shot, as long as
the offense is not involving a major, disqualification or misconduct penalty.
If the offense is a major, disqualification or misconduct penalty, the shot is
awarded, and the penalty is assessed.
How often does this happen, though?
3. I would think that penalty shots have a much higher rate of success than 20%.
I only saw 2 when I was at UMD, and they were both successful, and the ones I
have seen on TV are mostly successful. I am a stats freak, but I don't have any
kind of those numbers.
Tony
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|