AFrolik writes:
> Mike Machnik writes:
>
> >had a stronger schedule and performed better against it
> >proportionally, but that CC benefited from a weaker >conference
> >schedule than some of its opponents (Minnesota) which >allowed it to
> >capture the conference title.
>
> I would like to know how CC had a weaker conference schedule than Minnesota.
> Take out head to head games and they should have had the same strength of
> schedule in the conference.
>
The two teams Minnesota only played twice were CC and Michigan Tech.  I don't
remember who CC's other two-game team was, but it HAD to be stronger than Tech,
so Minnesota had to have a stronger in-conference schedule than CC.
-Pam