If it’s the goal I think you’re talking about, the officials ruled he didn’t interfere with the goalie. He was on the edge of the blue. I believe they changed the rule a couple of years ago where they used to call interference if the toe of a boot was in the blue and the man wearing the boot was in the men’s room.

> On Mar 26, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease?  I obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
> 
> Tom Rowe
> -- 
> ------------------------------
> I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound perspicacious.
> ------------------------------
>