HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Sweeney <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:37:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
As an alternative, if you set the 1-4 and 2-3 matchups, then move them
around to minimize the possibility of intraconference matchups:

1 BC v 16 AF
6 Ferris v 11 Denver

2 Mich v 13 Cornell
8 Minn v 9 BU

3 Union v 15 WMU
7 UMD v 10 Maine

4 NoDak v 14 Mich St
5 Miami v 12 Mass-Lowell

No reason to think the Committee will do that as they've said in the past
that avoiding second round matchups is not a priority, and this moves NoDak
and Mich farther from home.  A chance at an all-CCHA 2nd rounder can't be
avoided with 5 teams in the tourney, but should it happen, it would at
least be in the Great Lakes watershed.  (Of course, the 5 teams does
release the committee from having to shuffle the 4 seeds, if they don't
want to, but you still end up with Cornell in either GB or SP, since they
tend to keep the overall #1 with an Automatic Qualifier)

"Avoiding 2nd-round match-ups" would give them cover for making sure
there's a Hockey East team to help attendance in the Bridgeport regional.
It also lets them rely on Minn to support the St. Paul regional and try to
salvage GB attendance with traveling Whioux fans.
-Pam

ATOM RSS1 RSS2