HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe LaCour <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:30:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Bill

CHN posed a question.  I have declined to play the lottery in a few years 
when I was getting tickets from another source.  My priority did not move.

Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Corrigan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: F4 Detroit - tix lottery purchase policy


> Hi All,
>
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 12:58 PM, John Edwards wrote:
>
>> As I read this, if you're already in the system up to the 2009  Frozen 
>> Four,
>> then 2010 would count as normal. However, anyone going for the first 
>> time in
>> 2010 would not get priority status for 2011 and beyond. (Nor would 
>> anyone
>> buying tickets directly from Ford Field. That is stated at the end  of 
>> their
>> FAQ.)
>>
>> Presumably, anyone giving 2010 a miss would have their current  number 
>> (i.e.
>> including the 2009 FF) remain unchanged. In relative terms, it may  cause 
>> a
>> change in priority, someone who would be a 10 for 2010 would be  joined 
>> by
>> anyone who was a 9 after 2009, but went to Detroit.
>
>
> How does the above square with the following language appearing on  the 
> College Hockey News (CHN) website:
>
> "As in past years, priority list status applicants will receive the  first 
> opportunity. You get on the priority list based upon the amount  of years 
> in a row you have ordered tickets to the Frozen Four."
>
> So, if you pass on the 2010 tourney in Detroit, does that miss send  you 
> back to the tail end of the line (i.e. priority 1) in terms of  priority 
> status for years beyond 2010 since you will have broken the  consecutive 
> years guideline for priority status?
>
>
> Bill
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2