HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wayne T. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wayne T. Smith
Date:
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:04:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
USCHO.com has a story on Niagara Head Coach Dave Burkholder's 1-game
suspension by the CHA.  In that story you will see ...

>Afterward, Burkholder, was critical of the officiating. He was quoted on
>Niagara's website as saying, "To come all this way and play for first
>place, and have to kill off 13 minutes in penalties in the third period,
>on the road without even one power play, is a travesty to college hockey."

Will someone explain to me the thought process and ethics of this
statement, please?  I understand that a severe foul can be dealt with in a
variety of ways, but is Burkholder suggesting penalties should have been
called on the other team because some were called on his?

Am I misreading the quote, is it taken out of context, or does he have is
own definition of "college hockey"?

cheers, wayne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2