It is interesting, but when fans start to mention parity (recently by a HE
fan and now by a CCHA fan and of course that is a big word in the NFL
these days) it USUALLY infers top to bottom better than average top
competition ... unless you are referring to the ECAC where the same word
seems to have a different meaning.  :-)
 
Tony Buffa
RPI '64
 
========================
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Nathan Boyle wrote:
 
> It is simply one of those years where anybody has a shoot at beating
> everybody else.  OK so some teams have a far longer shoot than others,
> but never the less we are looking at a season that is shaping up to be a
> lot more interesting than last years run-away by big Blue.
>
> Dare I invoke the word "parity?"  I don't think I will.  Murphy's 23rd
> law of college hockey states that as soon as someone uses the word parity
> to describe the CCHA, LSSU (regardless of it's record to that time) will
> then win all it's remaining games and prove the description wrong.
 
==============================
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.