HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 May 2014 12:01:54 -0400
Message-ID:
<D2.A1.14090.0EBC3635@cdptpa-oedge03>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Article from yesterday (May 1) Minneapolis /Star Tribune/:

>The university is considering an $8 million renovation of Mariucci 
>that could potentially include a smaller ice sheet, ... A reduced 
>ice sheet (about 92 feet, 6 inches by 200 feet) from the current 
>Olympic-sized dimensions (100 feet by 200 feet) has been discussed. 
>The notion of a smaller rink will be a hot topic for hockey fans, 
>some of whom argue the Gophers need to get better on the smaller sheets.

They're proposing to go to 92 feet, halfway between NHL (85) and 
international (100).

Full article:

http://www.startribune.com/sports/gophers/257438471.html

In My Humble Opinion, everybody should go to the wider 
sheets.  Today's players are bigger, faster and stronger, and the 
extra 15 feet really opens up passing lanes.  (Yes, I know - in 
existing arenas, particularly NHL, it would cost a lot of money for 
the extra width.)

Joe
-- 
Joe Makowiec can be reached at:
http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe
http://makowiec.org/ 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2