HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:36:03 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: question on ruling
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Will Devine <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
The television replay showed that the puck crossed the line before the
whistle blew, although just barely.  The original call made by the ref was
that the goal didn't count, but it was changed after review.

--
Will Devine
[log in to unmask]


On 3/30/07, Sara M. Fagan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> OK, with all this talk about the officiating it makes me wonder about a
> call in the SLU-BC game.  I was there so I did not hear any TV commentary or
> the like.  BC's second goal appeared to all of us as going in after the
> whistle had blown.  It even seemed that is what was called on the ice at the
> time.  It went to a review and the call was reviewed.  BC got the goal.  Can
> anyone tell me why?
>
> Sara
> SLU '77
> Let's go SAINTS!!!
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2