Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:30:05 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Moller, Edward N." wrote:
> The NCAA won't grant an autobid to the Ivies now, but perhaps they should.
> With a six team league in place, and reports the the tournament will expand
> to 16 teams, this may be the time for the ECAC to break up. The MAAC and
> CHA autobids have forced the NCAA's hand in expansion, but the Ivy is a
> long-established association with a tremendous history. And with all the
> criticism the ECAC has taken lately, splitting off for the purpous of an
> autobid looks mighty attractive.
I was being facetious about the Ivy auto-bid; fact is, if the ECAC were to
split in two, it might be a long time before either new conference would gain
an autobid. The MAAC and CHA had to wait only two years, but I believe the
NCAA now has a rule in place stating that newly-formed conferences won't be
eligible for an autobid for something like eight years. (As I recall, there
was some concern that the CHA was going to be affected by this rule, due to the
status of Findlay as for-real Div. I or not)
The Ivy League itself has been around for a long time but it hasn't had its own
conference for hockey since the formation of the ECAC, if ever. I strongly
suspect the NCAA would consider them a "new" league and would enforce the new
autobid limit, whatever it is. Plus, most, if not all, of the non-Ivy ECAC
teams seem to like being associated with the Ivies. I doubt you'll see a split
any time soon.
--
Bill Fenwick Email: [log in to unmask]
Digicomp Research Voice: (607) 273-5900 ext 32
|
|
|