The attached mail was undeliverable as addressed.
 
Subject:   Felicity Jones :Unknown QM
Received: by qmrelay.mail.cornell.edu; 26 Feb 91 08:06:54
Received: from CORNELLC.BITNET by CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu (IBM VM SMTP
R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 5887; Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:03:16 EST
Received: from CORNELLC by CORNELLC.BITNET (Mailer R2.08A) with BSMTP id 2285;
 Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:03:15 EST
Received: from YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu by CORNELLC.BITNET (Mailer R2.08A) with
 BSMTP id 2283; Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:03:12 EST
Received: by YALEVM (Mailer R2.03B) id 5815; Tue, 26 Feb 91 08:02:35 EST
Date:         Tue, 26 Feb 91 07:56:30 EST
Reply-To:     College Hockey discussion list
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       College Hockey discussion list
<[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Douglas J. DeAngelis"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re:  HE vs. ECAC
X-To:         [log in to unmask]
To:           brenda Lapp <[log in to unmask]>,
              George Taber <[log in to unmask]>,
              don emmons Clarkson Cornell Boston College <[log in to unmask]>,
              Felicity Jones <[log in to unmask]>,
              Arthur Mintz <[log in to unmask]>
 
Sid Whitaker writes:
>Mike Machink wrote in a recent posting: "Hockey East is a much stronger league
>than the ECAC, and I don't know anybody who'd argue this."
>Well, I will. I believe that the ECAC is every bit as strong as Hockey East
>in any aspect....
 
If I may defend/clarify mike, I took his statement to mean that Hockey East
is much stronger than the ECAC *this year* and not in some large, innate,
spiritual way.  Would anyone still like to argue that?
 
-dug